Hotel

 

                           Image result for Hyatt Centric Fisherman's wharf

The official conference hotel is the Hyatt Centric Fisherman's Wharf. It is within a few blocks from Fisherman's Wharf and Ghirardelli Square. Our hotel offers free Wi-Fi and an outdoor pool.

 

Reservations can only be made through the link below before April 24. After that date, any rooms available will be at the regular Hyatt rates and must be booked through other channels.  

 

Adress: 555 North Point Street, 

San Francisco, California, USA, 94133

Tel: +1 415 563 1234

Fax: +1 415 486 4444

Registration

Social Activities

Welcome Reception

May 16, 2017, 6:00 to 8:00 pm

Sponsored by Sabre

 

Network Dinner

May 17, 2017, 6:00 to 9:00 pm

Sponsored by Sabre & Optiontown

General Information

Attire

Business Events - Business Casual

Welcome Reception - Business Casual

Social Events - Evening Casual

 

Weather

San Francisco weather is mild. Plan for low 45F/8C and high 70F/21C with clouds and small chance of rain.

More Information

For questions or more information, please contact:

 

Tassio Carvalho

Chair, AGIFORS Revenue Management Study Group

Email: tassio.carvalho@aa.com

Sunny Ja

Chair, AGIFORS Revenue Management Study Group

Email: shau-shiang.ja@aa.com

Visa Information

The United States requires visas or electronic authorization for travel from most countries. You can obtain more information at https://travel.state.gov/content/visas/en.html

 

If you need a visa, please check the wait time at your consulate and allow plenty of time. If you need supporting documentation for your application, please contact the conference chairs 

 

 

Agenda

 


 Tuesday, 16 May

18:00 20:00 Welcome Reception
  

 Wednesday, 17 May

08:30 09:00 Morning Coffee/Registration
09:00 09:15 Conference Opening
09:15 10:00 Welcome Address and Keynote Speech
10:00 10:30 Airline Update
10:30 10:50 Coffee Break
10:50 12:10 Presentations
12:10 13:30 Business Luncheon
13:30 15:00 Presentations
15:00 15:30 Coffee Break
15:30 16:15 Presentations
18:30 22:30 Conference Dinner
  

Thursday, 18-May

08:30 09:00 Morning Coffee
09:00 10:30 Presentations
10:30 10:50 Coffee Break
10:50 12:30 Presentations
12:30 13:30 Business Luncheon
13:30 14:40 Presentations
14:40 15:00 Coffee Break
16:50 17:00 Conference Close and Awards

Sponsors

  

     

  Infare Solutions A/S

    


   

  

 


Please contact Sunny Ja for sponsorship opportunities 

 

Host Airline

 

 

                

Call For Presentations

You are invited to submit a proposal to present at the meeting. Come and share with us your ideas, thoughts, practical innovations, current trends, case studies, philosophies, and latest advances on the topics which are relevant to you. 

 

Abstract Submission Deadline: April 07, 2017

Submit your paper today!

Draft Presentation Due: May 5th

Final Presentation Due: May 10th

 

Abstract submissions should be sent to:

shau-shiang.ja@aa.com  

 

Requirements

  • A 25-40 minute presentation
  • Willingness to comply with requests for additional information and clarification on abstract and/or presentation material
  • Willingness to tailor a presentation for the AGIFORS RM audience and to accept direction from the selection committee in doing this
  • Must register and attend the meeting

 

Host City

Situated on a peninsula separating San Francisco Bay from the Pacific Ocean, San Francisco is a uniquely picturesque city, whose scenic attractions include the largest cultivated urban park in the country, Golden Gate Park. Its notoriously steep streets, traversed by the famous cable cars, are home to a remarkably diverse ethnic population, and the city's reputation for tolerance and diversity is also evident in its history as a mecca for the gay community. Known for sophisticated cultural innovation and experimentation, San Francisco was the gathering place of the "beat" generation in the 1950s and a focal point of the 1960s counterculture, a hotbed of political protest and the birthplace of the "San Francisco Sound." Still known for its cultural attractions, today the Bay Area is also famous for its concentration of cutting-edge high-technology firms, which have drawn even more new residents to this populous region 

(Info from encyclopedia.com)

Technical Program

Airlines

Optimization models with conditional demand forecast

Wen Zhao - United Airlines

Conditional demand forecast (CDF) is a new type of demand forecaster developed at United Airlines. It forecasts the total demand under different control and environmental conditions, such as the lowest available fare. We show how different optimizers can be used with conditional demand forecasts. Four well known optimizers are discussed: EMSRb, fare adjusted EMSRb, and two versions of dynamic programming. Numerical examples are used to demonstrate how these optimizers perform under different scenarios.


Aligning RM systems with top-down commercial strategies: A systematic approach

Raimundo Sánchez - LATAM Airlines

Aligning RM system recommendations to top-down strategies, when the underlying assumptions differ, can become very intensive in analyst hours, especially in OD optimization where managed markets grow quadratically with respect to the size of the network. Historically, manual influencing of the system, implemented by an army of RM analysts, was the solution. At LATAM we have developed a methodology to incorporate top-down strategies and expectations into our RM system through a systematic and scalable approach, capturing benefits in revenue and minimizing the human interaction with the systems, making it both efficient and granular.


Is Max Stay Rule Always Lucrative?

Abdullah Bilgin and Emir Ali Göze – Turkish Airlines

Maximum stay rule states how many days at maximum should be between departure and arrival flights of a round trip journey. The aim is basically to increase revenue by pushing passengers to buy higher/more flexible fares when she needs to stay more than a specified duration. This study examines the conditions where max stay rule on fares may result in better revenue. Data set consists of three type of markets; short stay market (average stay duration is less than 3 days), medium stay market (average stay duration is between 4 and 10 days), and long stay market (average stay duration is more than 11 days). For each market, there are 3 competitors. While being able to change max stay rule, we assume that all other factors that may affect passenger preference are the same for all competitors, like price levels, product quality, elapsed time, etc. We analyze the problem with a game-theoritic approach, where each competitor may decide on max stay rule at the beginning of each time period.


Connecting pricing back to inventory control - a systems view

Gert Hartmans – KLM

Changing technology and pricing strategies may lead to a disconnect between revenue management fundamentals of inventory control and the pricing and system features applied. We will cover revenue management system developments, competitive context and pricing developments to try and understand how we came to where we are now. Next describe how changes like Fuel surcharges, Low cost competitors, Changes in class combinability, Return versus one ways, Ancillaries, Fare Families or Branded Fares lead, etc  to changes that affect Inventory Control )often negatively). From that, let’s see if we can define a strategy taking all the possibilities of inventory control and system functionality into account that could provide a profitable strategy, and/or identify the limitations to profitability given an airlines structural position. Also let’s look at how to aligning pricing with inventory control, and what technology is needed to support this.


Fare optimization based on price competitiveness in LCCs markets

Francesco Schena - Etihad Airways/Alitalia

Low-cost carriers (LCC) pricing is dynamic and fares are often not distributed publicly. This makes it hard for competitors to follow and benchmark their pricing strategies and tactics. In my case study a network carrier set optimal fare levels and rules based on the desired price positioning against low-cost competitors, on each booking day before departure (DBD). Using the history of competitors' available fares in a given market, we estimated the probability to undercut (PTU) competitors with current fares on each DBD. We then optimized fare levels and advance purchase rules, constrained to the desired PTU level for each DBD. This can result, particularly on price-sensitive markets, in a more effective revenue steering.


Pricing Optimization & Automation – Quantum Pricing

Octavian Oancea, Raghuvir Konanki Nallapati, Bhaskara Guntreddy, Goutham Komirishetty  - Etihad Airways

Nowadays, the processes of benchmarking and pricing implementation are primarily human-driven. To overcome the need for higher speed to market, as well as to more efficiently utilize the pricing human resource in defining and driving strategies, the initiative of a human-assisted pricing optimization system has been started by Etihad Airways, called Quantum Pricing. In partnership with Sabre Consulting, the development of Quantum Pricing has made possible to identify and generate fare changes and update them dynamically in ATPCO, with the ability to drive continuous price points for improved demand capture, differentiate price based on willingness to pay and various business rules, increase breadth of monitoring and consistency in response to competitors across the network. We will address the challenges we have faced in designing the solution as well as in driving the change from an organizational point of view.


The bid price - Swiss army knife of RM

Jonas Rauch - Lufthansa German Airlines

The bid price or a similar concept is at the heart of all Revenue Management methods, although it is not always visible and sometimes called differently. Despite its widespread use and the large body of scientific research there are many misconceptions about the bid price, especially among practitioners. As a result it is not used to its full potential, but instead often misused to pursue goals it is neither meant nor suited to achieve.

Besides a short reminder about its definition, this presentation focuses on the economic meaning and some interesting properties of the bid price. The second part covers implications for RM practice, including a number of potential applications apart from the core RM task of computing booking class availability


A deeper look into the modelling and implications of postponement in customer behavior

Daniel Hopman – Emirates Airlines

In the revenue management literature, it is typically assumed that when a customer arrives in the system, it either makes a purchase or is gone forever. In this paper, we provide an analysis of postponement behavior. Postponement, or waiting behavior, occurs when a customer makes one or more attempts before making their purchase. This calls for definitions of what waiting really is and propose these in this paper. We investigate several variables that may influence this behavior. We then use these findings to extend simulations from our earlier work and study the effects using three revenue management strategies. We also discuss what the implications are of postponement on forecasting demand.



Academic


Dynamic Pricing vs Revenue Management under Competition: Single vs Repeated Games

Guillermo Gallego - Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Richard Ratliff - Sabre

In this talk we consider dynamic pricing (where any price can be chosen) vs Revenue Management (where only a menu of prices can be chosen). We seek a Nash equilibrium for both single games and infinitely repeated games. For single games, examples show that RM can sometimes have an advantage if the menu is decided ex-ante but the advantage disappears if the decision of the fare menu itself is part of the Nash equilibrium. In repeated games Folk’s theorem applies and trigger strategies lead to cooperation provided the discount rate is sufficiently high.


A Constant-Factor Approximation Algorithm for Capacity Allocation with Fare-Locking

Mika Sumida, Huseyin Topaloglu – Cornell University

We study a revenue management model over a single flight leg, where the customers are allowed to lock an available fare. Each customer arrives into the system with an interest in purchasing a ticket for a particular fare class. If this fare class is available, the customer either immediately purchases the ticket by paying the fare or locks the fare by paying a fee. If the customer locks the fare, then the airline reserves the capacity for the customer for a certain duration of time. At the end of this duration of time, the customer makes her ultimate purchase decision at the locked fare. The goal of the airline is to find a policy to decide which set of fare classes to make available at each time period to maximize the total expected revenue. Such fare locking options are commonly offered by airlines today, but the dynamic programming formulation of the revenue management problem with the option to lock an available fare has a high dimensional state variable that keeps track of the locked fares. We develop an approximate policy that is guaranteed to obtain at least half of the optimal total expected revenue. Our approach is based on leveraging a linear programming approximation to decompose the problem by the seats on the flight and solving a dynamic program that controls the capacity on each seat separately. We also show that our results continue to hold when the airline makes pricing decisions, instead of fare class availability decisions. Our numerical study shows that the practical performance our approximate policy is remarkably good when compared with a tractable upper bound on the optimal total expected revenue.


Using Online Surveys to Develop Choice Set Generation Models

Laurie A. Garrow – Georgia Institute of Technology

In recent years, there has been growing interest in using discrete choice models to forecast demand for revenue management (RM) products.  One of the key limitations with existing choice-based RM models is that they do not incorporate different choice set generation rules, e.g., they do not model how individuals filter or screen alternatives prior to making a decision.  To help address this limitation, we designed an online experiment to capture how individuals filter and screen alternatives.  We ran this experiment on Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) and Qualtrics. We present preliminary results comparing responses obtained from AMT (a crowdsourcing Internet marketplace), Qualtrics (a traditional marketing survey panel), and an online survey conducted by  the Resource Systems Group that recruited participants from airlines’ frequent flyer databases. Based on these results, we offer a conceptual framework for how online surveys can be used to develop a choice set generation model.  This research is supported in part by a NASA LEARN grant.


Simultaneous Dynamic Pricing of Horizontally Differentiated Flights

Michael D. Wittman – MIT

We consider the problem of an airline jointly pricing two or more flights with horizontally differentiated attributes, such as departure time. In a departure from past approaches using logit choice models, we use a Hotelling line (also called a locational choice model), to generate purchase probabilities for each flight. We then develop heuristics to dynamically modify the fares that would ordinarily be offered by an airline's RM system for each flight. Results from the PODS RM simulator show incremental revenue gains when the simultaneous pricing heuristic is used to jointly price two flights with a single attribute, compared to a dynamic pricing method (PFDynA) that prices each flight separately. The gains result from offering price-sensitive passengers discounts to book less-attractive flights, leading to greater availability on more-attractive flights for schedule-sensitive passengers.

 

Incorporating Ancillary Services in Passenger Choice: Revenue and Booking Impacts

Adam Bockelie – MIT International Center for Air Transportation

As ancillary services provide an increasing proportion of total revenue, the need to integrate their revenues into airline revenue management (RM) systems grows.  Previous attempts at ancillary-aware RM used “optimizer increment” heuristics with mixed revenue performance.  We propose a new dynamic programming approach that explicitly accounts for ancillary services and passenger choice and is an optimal formulation under certain conditions.  We also propose an ancillary marginal revenue transformation and forecasting method that can extend traditional RM methods to support ancillaries.  We demonstrate the revenue and booking impacts of our proposals with the Passenger Origin-Destination Simulator.


Impact of Bid Price Floors and Freezes under Origin-Destination Control with Cancellations and Overbooking

Larry Weatherford – University of Wyoming

We have seen some results over the years where bid prices (or displacement costs) decline when a flight is close to departure.  This could allow low-yield bookings at a time when high willingness-to-pay customers are shopping.  This research will look at the effect of putting either a ‘floor’ or a ‘freeze’ on the bid prices to keep them from spiraling down close to departure.  We will use PODS Network U10 (a large “international” network with 572 O&D markets with four airlines competing for passengers, including an LCC) to simulate the competitive effects when one airline implements these floors/freezes when using one of three different O-D methods (ProBP, Unbucketed DP with a point estimate, and UDP with a vector estimate) .  This research builds on prior work by Adam Bockelie of MIT by adding the complexity of allowing cancellations and overbooking.


How Should RM Management Think About User Influence?

Bill Brunger - PODS Research LLC

Following up on last year’s research, and using the PODS simulator as a diagnostic device, the author will look at some kinds of support and guidance that RM Management could give to Users in order to influence RM systems more effectively, and to counter known RM forecasting/system limitations. 


A New Approach to Choice-Based Revenue Management

Virginie Lurkin - University of Liege

The objective of revenue management is to determine the number of products to sell at a particular price and at a particular time to maximize the operator revenue. Different approaches have been proposed to solve this problem including protection levels, products assignments, products availability, or pricing thresholds (called bid prices). Over the past years, there has been a growing interest in modeling customer choice behavior in revenue management problems. In this talk, we introduce a new formulation for Choice-Based Revenue Management in which the nonlinearity of the demand model, which is due to the random nature of the utility function, is circumvented with simulation.



Vendors


Update on the ATPCO Dynamic Pricing Working Group Specifications

Richard Ratliff – Sabre

In early 2016, ATPCO organized a new, standards setting body for dynamic pricing engines (DPE).  Their objective is to develop an industry standard interoperability specification for airline (or vendor supplied) dynamic pricing engines (DPE’s) for use in global distribution systems (GDS’s), airline systems and other distribution channels.  The group’s design approach has emphasized maximizing reuse of existing travel distribution technical standards to minimize changes to current systems while providing support for both dynamically priced airfare increases (markups) and decreases (markdowns).  The ATPCO working group is comprised of a coalition of about 20 airlines, GDS’s, and marketing and technology providers.

Earlier this year, we announced the completion of an initial, end-to-end specification for airline DPE’s.  This presentation will describe the work-to-date including the latest proposed specifications.


Competing for Customers When Some of Them Are Loyal

Darius Walczak - PROS & Siddharth Prakash Singh - Carnegie Mellon University

We analyze a two-competitor dynamic pricing game introduced by Dudey (1992) and subsequently considered within the revenue management framework by Martinez-de-Albeniz and Talluri (2011). We allow a general distribution of customer valuation and expand the game to include demand that is loyal to each airline, in addition to those customers who seek the lowest price in the market. The extension is particularly relevant in the airline industry where airlines often have demand that is price-sensitive but dedicated to a particular carrier. We research conditions for the existence and uniqueness of a pure-strategy Nash equilibrium and make a comparison to the case when the capacities of both competitors in the market are pooled.


Evaluating Forecasts Efficacy: A New Approach

Edward Kambour – PROS

Measuring the precision of forecasts is problematic on many levels; largely due to the effects of living in a random world.  In many cases, the best science measures aren’t particularly user-friendly and the user-friendly approaches perform poorly from a scientific perspective.  Visualization and analytics can be greatly informative, but require considerable searching and don’t provide a concise measurement (e.g. as a general bullet point number, or as an “out of control signal”).  A best process must be scientifically optimal, proficient at addressing randomness and natural variation, user-friendly, actionable, and analogous to 6-sigma approaches to quality.  In this presentation we will introduce an approach designed specifically to hit all of these “sweet spots”.


Offer Management System - The future of airline distribution and pricing

Thomas Fiig – Amadeus

Today Revenue Management Systems (RMS) and merchandizing are seen as two separate processes. RMS’ responsibility is to price the airline seat alone, while merchandizing is responsible for expanding the shopping basket (up-sell, cross-sell, and ancillary services); by providing more relevant and personalized offers – in accordance with the airlines commercial strategies (e.g. channel adoption, personalization, loyalty, campaigns & promotion, etc.). This approach is inadequate, since RMS only have partial knowledge of the revenue streams (from the flight seat) and therefore the decisions of which products and prices to offer to the customers are driven by neither revenue optimization nor conversions.

The long term vision is to build an Offer Management System (OMS) that integrates the RMS and merchandising in a central engine that define the product and price offerings aligned with the airline’s commercial strategy. The price will cover all aspects of the deal, including seat reservations, taxes, ancillary services and other 3rd party products. Such personalized offers will disrupt the entire distribution landscape, in order to provide a sustainable technical model in terms of content, consistency, and performance across all actors in the travel industry. The paper discusses the distribution and pricing challenges and discusses how a successful deployment of OMS may be feasible in the light of NDC.


A Zero Displacement Cost Model for Segment/O&D Revenue Management

Landie Qiu – revenue management systems

Most traditional O&D network revenue management methods are based on either leg-based nesting and booking limits (EMSRb, VEMSRb and DAVN) or Bid Price (Heuristic and Deterministic). Leg-based EMSRb may not appropriately value long-haul connecting passengers who may provide more total revenue than local passengers. VEMSRb was developed to take total O&D fares into consideration and prioritize the wide variety of O&D fares by using a larger number of virtual classes. However, the following models argue that VEMSRb is too “greedy” for long-haul O&D passengers and it ignores the displacement cost of driving local passengers away. Therefore, DAVN, Heuristic Bid Price and Deterministic Bid Price models started to use EMSR values or Shadow Prices as displacement costs to calculate the net value for every O&D passenger for either prioritization or open/close decisions.

This 0DC (zero displacement cost) model considers the possibility that connecting passengers may not displace local passengers. For example, if the flight is forecasted to have empty seats (Spoilage) at departure, there will be no displacement cost for taking a connecting passenger. For flights with demand greater than capacity (Spill), this model does take into consideration the displacement. Both concepts are applied in the proposed new Segment/O&D Revenue Management model. This new model uses historical data to dynamically forecast if displacement will occur on each flight at each NDO (Number of Days Out). Therefore, it may help airlines sell seats to higher-fare connecting passengers and also eliminate their displacement costs..

 

Codeshare Alerts to detect misalignments between partners

Xing Li, Hunkar Toyoglu, Joakim Kalvenes – Sabre Consulting

We present a novel tool, Codeshare Alerts, for the goal to systematically detect fare deviation and availability misalignment between operating carriers and their codeshare partners. This work is motivated by airlines’ need to prevent revenue dilution as result of inconsistent codeshare pricing and inventory controls. Codeshare Alerts collects data via a customizable shopping robot on Sabre GDS based on observed passenger booking patterns. Itineraries are analyzed against business rules and RBD mappings to generate pricing and inventory alerts. Actions are recommended at leg-level considering network-level revenue impact. Results from several airline customers show this tool to be accurate, scalable, and effective in reducing revenue spills in daily codeshare route operations. This tool is a quick-win practice to protect airline benefits from rapidly expanding codeshare partnerships.


A Benchmarking study of passenger choice based optimization algorithms on real airline networks

Goda Doreswamy, Mohammad Liaee, Atul Kumar Malik, Sylvia Zhu, Amol Deshmukh - Sabre Airline Solutions

The last 10 years have seen huge changes in the airline industry business environment due to entry of low cost carriers with simplified fare structures and distribution via internet that provided price transparency to the end passenger. All the traditional assumptions of independent passenger demand with clearly fenced fare structures got invalidated and necessitated modeling passenger choice in forecasting demand. The consideration of passenger choice in modeling spill and recapture estimation while evaluating control policies needs to be an inherent part of optimization algorithms.

This study leverages Sabre’s simulation tool Airline planning and operations simulator (APOS) to evaluate multiple choice based optimization algorithms for revenue management decisions on real leg and O&D airline networks. Three enhanced optimization methods are benchmarked on a base case of DLP+EMSRb system that uses traditional demand forecasts.

a.         DLP_OD + EMSRcb (Choice based EMSRb)

b.         DLP_OD + Time DPCP (Choice based Time DP )

c.         Stochastic network optimization with spill and recapture based on Genetic algorithms

These methodologies model the interaction of demand across different available price points of a given itinerary as well as other itinerary options in the market conditional on the control policy.


Advanced prediction methods for massive airfare datasets using Apache Spark

Josef Habdank – INFARE Solutions

Developing and deploying a scalable prediction platform is a very challenging task that many big data practitioners are struggling with. The holy grail of data science/prediction infrastructure is to train the prediction models in real time as the data is collected and streamed into the data center, and serving the prediction results in an on-demand fashion via a service. In this talk the speaker will go through a set of online machine learning tools that if used appropriately can be scaled to work on truly massive datasets with of billions or tens of billions of rows flowing through the system daily. The talk will cover dimensionality reduction, clustering and prediction using both simple tools such as linear regression as well as more advanced tools such as Markov Chains. At Infare Solutions this framework is developed to be used on a massively multivariate time series, collecting a 1.5billion+ new airfares daily, as support tool for the airline Revenue Management systems.


Evaluating the impact of localized short-term events on revenue and demand for air travel

Christopher Hein - VIA Software

Evaluating the impact of past and future short-term localized events, such as trade shows and conferences, on demand for air travel as well as revenue faces a number of challenges. For example multiple events can co-occur with each other or with school or public holidays. In addition events may change location. They may also have an effect prior to their commencing and after having finished. In this presentation we compare pure estimation approaches and two step procedures that entail a separate step each for estimation and prediction. We argue in favour of the latter using a generalized additive model as an example. We emphasize that the type of model chosen should be complemented by adequate pre-processing of available event data. We show how the multidimensional event data can be transformed into a meaningful and useful scalar indicator using structural equation modeling. We illustrate our results with real data.

  

Subscription Revenue Management : Lockin Customers Lock-out Competition

Sachin Goel - Optiontown

Air travel has been for too long, and still is, an impulsive one-time purchase often based upon the strongest influences at the booking moment. A slightly lower fare, a timing that seems thirty minutes more convenient, a new product, a new brand, a new gimmick. While Frequent Flyer Programs try to address this, even that is not a given these days. Consider the mobile phone industry; how often does a subscriber switch telephone service providers? Rarely, if ever! Imagine locking-in even part of such loyalty into the airline business.

Imagine locking in your customers to blocks of 5, 10, 20 flights, or more! Imagine not having to win customers’ loyalty on a trip-by-trip basis! Imagine securing up-front revenues, improving cash flow. Well now you can; over 20 airlines including British Airways, Singapore Airline-TATA JV (Vistara), Alitalia, Kenya Airways, Fly Dubai (to name a few), have launched a disruptive innovation - Flight Pass, developed by Optiontown. It helps in minimizing the cost, time and effort invested in the flight booking process. Compared to static, restrictive older airline coupon booklets, the new flight subscription can be customized by customers and revenue managed by airlines. So, a perfect win-win for both!

In subscription, the customer can lock-in a price for a number of trips and self-define all the terms like number of destinations, peak or off-peak travel periods, the lead-time for booking, the names of multiple passengers and so forth. Airlines can fully revenue manage the subscription pricing; the price per flight offered depends upon the conditions chosen by the customer and is dynamically calculated by subscription revenue management algorithms based on predetermined rules fed by the airline. Subscription increases customer’s willingness to pay as they tend to pay more for greater freedom and premium features, flexibility and convenience. The benefits of a flight subscription can be shared with friends and family effortlessly. Flight pass is a light touch implementation with no capital expenditure and no IT development from the airline Recently, the Kenya Airways Flight Pass took less than 30 days – from very first business meeting to the launch date (soup-to-nuts!) It is time to re-think the fundamental paradigm. Risk fighting for every single ticket sale or build subscribers paying you hundreds or thousands of dollars per month for years to come.


Contact us

Address: AGIFORS President, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332

Phone: +1 (404) 385-6634

Email: president@agifors.org

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software